Factors associated with US caregivers' uptake of pediatric COVID-19 vaccine by race and ethnicity

Objectives To assess differences in willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19, and factors that may be associated with increased acceptance, among US caregivers of various racial and ethnic identities who presented with their child to the Emergency Department (ED) after emergency use authorization of vaccines for children ages 5-11. Study Design: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey of caregivers presenting to 11 pediatric EDs in the United States in November-December 2021. Caregivers were asked about their identified race and ethnicity and if they planned to vaccinate their child. We collected demographic data and inquired about caregiver concerns related to COVID-19. We compared responses by race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic regression models served to determine factors that were independently associated with increased vaccine acceptance overall and among racial/ethnic groups. Results Among 1,916 caregivers responding, 54.67% planned to vaccinate their child against COVID-19. Large differences in acceptance were noted by race/ethnicity, with highest acceptance among Asian caregivers (61.1%) and those who did not specify a listed racial identity (61.1%);caregivers identifying as Black (44.7%) or Multi-racial (44.4%) had lower acceptance rates. Factors associated with intent to vaccinate differed by racial/ethnic group, and included caregiver COVID-19 vaccine receipt (all groups), caregiver concerns about COVID-19 (White caregivers), and having a trusted primary provider (Black caregivers). Conclusions Caregiver intent to vaccinate children against COVID-19 varied by race/ethnicity, but race/ethnicity did not independently account for these differences. Caregiver COVID-19 vaccination status, concerns about COVID-19, and presence of a trusted primary provider are important in vaccination decisions.

Parents' intent to vaccinate against influenza during the COVID-19 pandemic in two regions in Switzerland.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to overlap with the seasonal influenza epidemic, increasing the risk of overextending the health system capacity in Switzerland. Influenza vaccine uptake has remained low in most countries, including Switzerland. The aim of the study was to determine parents’ intentions towards influenza vaccination of their children, as well as themselves, and to assess regional differences. METHODS: Parents presenting to four paediatric emergency departments (Zurich, Bern, Bellinzona, Geneva) were asked to complete an online survey during and after the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic (April to June 2020). The anonymised survey included demographic information, vaccination history and intentions to vaccinate against influenza, as well as attitudes towards future vaccination against COVID-19. RESULTS: The majority of children (92%; 602/654) were up-to-date on their vaccination schedule. In 2019/2020, 7.2% (47/654) were vaccinated against influenza. Children with chronic illnesses were more frequently vaccinated than healthy children (19.2% vs 5.6%; p = 0.002). For the coming winter season, 111 (17%) parents stated they plan to vaccinate their children against influenza, more than double the rate from last year, and 383 (59.2%) parents suggested they will vaccinate against COVID-19 once a vaccine is available. Regional differences between “German” and “Latin” Switzerland were found for parents’ intent to have their children vaccinated against influenza next season (Zurich and Bern 14.3%, Bellinzona and Geneva 27.2%, p <0.001), but not for a hypothetical vaccination against COVID-19 (Zurich and Bern 59.1%, Bellinzona and Geneva 59.7%, p = 0.894). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a substantial increase of parents’ intention to vaccinate their children against influenza, especially in hard-hit “Latin” Switzerland. The Swiss government and public health organisations can leverage these regional results to promote influenza vaccination among children for the coming seasons.

Factors associated with US caregivers' uptake of pediatric COVID-19 vaccine by race and ethnicity.

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19, and factors that may be associated with increased acceptance, among US caregivers of various racial and ethnic identities who presented with their child to the Emergency Department (ED) after emergency use authorization of vaccines for children ages 5-11. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey of caregivers presenting to 11 pediatric EDs in the United States in November-December 2021. Caregivers were asked about their identified race and ethnicity and if they planned to vaccinate their child. We collected demographic data and inquired about caregiver concerns related to COVID-19. We compared responses by race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic regression models served to determine factors that were independently associated with increased vaccine acceptance overall and among racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS: Among 1916 caregivers responding, 54.67% planned to vaccinate their child against COVID-19. Large differences in acceptance were noted by race/ethnicity, with highest acceptance among Asian caregivers (61.1%) and those who did not specify a listed racial identity (61.1%); caregivers identifying as Black (44.7%) or Multi-racial (44.4%) had lower acceptance rates. Factors associated with intent to vaccinate differed by racial/ethnic group, and included caregiver COVID-19 vaccine receipt (all groups), caregiver concerns about COVID-19 (White caregivers), and having a trusted primary provider (Black caregivers). CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver intent to vaccinate children against COVID-19 varied by race/ethnicity, but race/ethnicity did not independently account for these differences. Caregiver COVID-19 vaccination status, concerns about COVID-19, and presence of a trusted primary provider are important in vaccination decisions.

Temporal trends in anaphylaxis ED visits over the last decade and the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on these trends.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is an acute systemic and potentially fatal allergic reaction. We evaluated trends in yearly rates of anaphylaxis in a pediatric Emergency Department (ED) in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: A prospective and retrospective recruitment process was used to find families of children who had presented with anaphylaxis at the Montreal Children's Hospital between April 2011 and April 2021. Using a uniform recruitment form, data were collected. Anaphylaxis patterns were compared to clinical triggers using descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Among 830,382 ED visits during the study period, 2726 (26% recruited prospectively) presented with anaphylaxis. The median age was 6 years (IQR: 0.2, 12.00), and 58.7% were males. The relative frequency of anaphylaxis cases doubled between 2011-2015, from 0.22% (95% CI, 0.19, 0.26) to 0.42 March 2020, the total absolute number of anaphylaxis cases and relative frequency declined by 24 cases per month (p < 0.05) and by 0.5% of ED visits (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of anaphylaxis has changed over the years, representing modifications in food introduction strategies or lifestyle changes. The decrease in the frequency of anaphylaxis presenting to the ED during the COVID pandemic may reflect decreased accidental exposures with reduced social gatherings, closed school, and reluctance to present to ED.

La myocardite et la péricardite après un vaccin à ARN messager contre la COVID-19.

QUESTION: À la suite de l'approbation d'un vaccin contre la maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pour les enfants de 5 à 11 ans et compte tenu de préoccupations de parents au cours de la dernière année face à des cas rapportés de myocardite et de péricardite chez des adolescents, ma clinique devrait-elle continuer à encourager tous les enfants et les jeunes adultes à recevoir le vaccin à ARN messager contre la COVID-19? RÉPONSE: Depuis avril 2021, des rapports ont documenté des cas de myocardite et de péricardite chez des adolescents et des jeunes adultes ayant reçu un vaccin à ARN messager contre la COVID-19, et plusieurs centaines de signalements semblables ont été documentés au Canada. Les schémas cliniques étaient majoritairement bénins, avec quelques rares hospitalisations, et les cas touchaient habituellement des adolescents masculins de 16 ans et plus dans les quelques jours suivant la deuxième dose du vaccin. Après la vaccination, les enfants et les adolescents qui présentent des symptômes comme des douleurs thoraciques, de la dyspnée ou des palpitations devraient être évalués en procédant à un examen physique et à un électrocardiogramme, et en mesurant les taux de troponines cardiaques. Si les résultats sont anormaux, il y a lieu d'envisager un échocardiogramme ou une imagerie cardiaque par résonance magnétique. La myocardite et la péricardite subséquentes à la vaccination sont bien moins courantes et beaucoup moins graves que les complications cardiaques d'une infection à la COVID-19, et les vaccins devraient continuer à être recommandés auprès de toutes les personnes admissibles.

Should COVID-19 vaccines be mandated in schools? - an international caregiver perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Caregiver attitudes toward mandating COVID-19 vaccines for their children are poorly understood. We aimed to determine caregiver acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine mandates for schools/daycares and assess if opposition to mandates would result in removal of children from the educational system. STUDY DESIGN: Perform a cross-sectional, anonymous survey of adult caregivers with children ≤ 18 years presenting to 21 pediatric emergency departments in the United States, Canada, Israel, and Switzerland, November 1st through December 31st, 2021. The primary outcome was caregiver acceptance rates for school vaccine mandates, and the secondary outcomes included factors associated with mandate acceptance and caregiver intention to remove the child from school. RESULTS: Of 4,393 completed surveys, 37% of caregivers were opposed to any school vaccine mandate. Caregiver acceptance was lowest for daycare settings (33%) and increased as the child's level of education increased, college (55%). 26% of caregivers report a high likelihood (score of 8-10 on 0-10 scale) to remove their child from school if the vaccine became mandatory. Child safety was caregivers' greatest concern over vaccine mandates. A multivariable model demonstrated intent to vaccinate their child for COVID-19 (OR = 8.9, 95% CI 7.3 to 10.8; P < 0.001) and prior COVID-19 vaccination for the caregiver (OR = 3.8, 95% CI 3.0 to 4.9; P < 0.001) had the greatest odds of increasing mandate acceptance for any school level. CONCLUSIONS: Many caregivers are resistant to COVID-19 vaccine mandates for schools, and acceptance varies with school level. One-fourth of caregivers plan to remove their child from the educational system if vaccines become mandated.

Case Report: A Very Low Birth Weight Female Infant With Congenital Bilateral Periventricular Leukomalacia, Born to a Mother With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

A 26-year-old primipara woman with COVID-19 performed an emergency Cesarean section due to further hypoxemia at 28 weeks 5/7 days gestation. The female neonate was born weighing 1,347 gram with an Apgar score of four at 1 min, three at 5 min, and eight at 10 min. RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 were performed at birth, 24 h, and 48 h after birth, all of which were negative. On head ultrasound bilateral cystic lesions were found in the anterior horn of the lateral ventricles at birth. A brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test at 56 days of life (corrected 36 weeks and 6/7 days) revealed cystic lesions with T1 low signal, T2 high signal, and T2 Flair high signal around the anterior horn of the lateral ventricle and We diagnose it as Grade 2 periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). She was discharged on day 64 of life, with no abnormality on exam. While the majority of neonates born to women with COVID-19 during pregnancy have favorable outcome, we report a case of a neonate with Grade 2 periventricular leukomalacia and this should prompt clinicians to monitor fetal cerebral function and structure shortly after birth.

A multicentre Canadian survey of caregiver perspectives on COVID vaccine-related pain and stress for their family.

Background: Caregiver hesitancy for their children to receive the COVID-19 vaccine remains due to concerns regarding safety and efficacy, but also due to fear of vaccine administration-related pain and distress. Study objectives were to determine caregivers' perceptions regarding both their personal and child's COVID-19 vaccine administration-related stress and fear and relate this to their likelihood to allow their child to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. Methods: This study was a secondary data analysis of a multicentre, cross-sectional survey of caregivers presenting to four Canadian pediatric emergency departments. Caregivers were surveyed between December 2020 and March 2021 and completed a digital survey on their own smartphones. Results: 331 caregivers responded to the survey (mean age 39.9 years [SD 7.71]); 74.2% (245/331) were mothers. Children's mean age was 8.8 years [SD 5.4]; 49.8% (165/331) were female. 64.1% (209/326) of caregivers were willing to vaccinate their child against COVID-19, while 35.9% (117/326) were not. Greater perceived COVID-19 vaccine administration-related pain (0.88 [0.80; 0.95], p = .003) and stress (0.82 [0.76; 0.89], p = <.001) for their child as well as greater perceived personal stress with their own COVID-19 vaccine administration (0.81 [0.75; 0.88], p = <.001) were associated with caregivers being less likely to vaccinate their child. Conclusions: During the time period between COVID-19 pandemic waves 2 and 3, and after the vaccine had been federally approved for adults, one-third of Canadian caregivers surveyed reported being unwilling to vaccinate their child against COVID-19 in the future. Managing children's and caregivers' vaccine administration-related fear and stress may improve vaccine uptake for children.

The responsibility to care: lessons learned from emergency department workers' perspectives during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.

BACKGROUND: This study's objective was to examine emergency department (ED) workers' perspectives during the Canadian COVID-19 first wave. METHODS: This qualitative study included workers from nine Canadian EDs who participated in 3 monthly video focus groups between April and July 2020 to explore (1) personal/professional experiences, (2) patient care and ED work, (3) relationships with teams, institutions and governing bodies. Framework analysis informed data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-six focus groups and 15 interviews were conducted with 53 participants (including 24 physicians, 16 nurses). Median age was 37.5 years, 51% were female, 79% had more than 5 years' experience. Three main themes emerged. (1) Early in this pandemic, participants felt a responsibility to provide care to patients and solidarity toward their ED colleagues and team, while balancing many risks with their personal protection. (2) ED teams wanted to be engaged in decision-making, based on the best available scientific knowledge. Institutional decisions and clinical guidelines needed to be adapted to the specificity of each ED environment. (3) Working during the pandemic created new sources of moral distress and fatigue, including difficult clinical practices, distance with patients and families, frequent changes in information and added sources of fatigue. Although participants quickly adapted to a "new normal", they were concerned about long-term burnout. Participants who experienced high numbers of patient deaths felt especially unprepared. INTERPRETATION: ED workers believe they have a responsibility to provide care through a pandemic. Trust in leadership is supported by managers who are present and responsive, transparent in their communication, and involve ED staff in the development and practice of policies and procedures. Such practices will help protect from burnout and ensure the workforce's long-term sustainability.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Cette étude avait pour objectif d'examiner le point de vue des travailleurs des services d'urgence pendant la première vague de la COVID-19 au Canada. MéTHODES: Cette étude qualitative a inclus des travailleurs de neuf services d'urgence canadiens qui ont participé à 3 groupes de discussion monsuels par visioconférence entre avril et juillet 2020, pour explorer: (1) leurs expériences personnelles/professionnelles, (2) les soins aux patients et le travail au service d'urgence, (3) leurs relations avec les équipes, les institutions et instances dirigeantes. Le "framework analysis" a guidé le receuil et l'analyse des données. RéSULTATS: Trente-six groupes de discussion et 15 entretiens individuels ont été menés avec 53 participants (dont 24 médecins et 16 infirmières). L'âge médian était de 37,5 ans, 51% étaient des femmes, 79% avaient plus de 5 ans d'expérience. Trois thèmes principaux sont ressortis. (1) Au début de cette pandémie, les participants se sont sentis responsables de prodiguer des soins aux patients et solidaires envers leurs collègues et leurs équipes des urgences, tout en cherchant à équilibrer la gestion de nombreux risques et leur protection personnelle. (2) Les équipes des services d'urgence souhaitaient participer aux prises de décision, informées par les meilleures connaissances scientifiques disponibles. Les décisions institutionnelles et les lignes directrices cliniques doivent être adaptées à la spécificité de chaque salle d'urgence. (3) Travailler pendant la pandémie a créé de nouvelles sources de détresse morale et de fatigue, notamment des pratiques cliniques difficiles, la distance avec les patients et les familles, les changements fréquents d'information. Bien que les participants se soient rapidement adaptés à une « nouvelle normalité¼, ils étaient préoccupés par l'épuisement professionnel des travailleurs au long terme. Les participants qui ont vécu un nombre élevé de décès de patients à l'urgence se sentaient particulièrement mal préparés. INTERPRéTATION: Les travailleurs des services d'urgence estiment qu'ils ont la responsabilité de fournir des soins en cas de pandémie. Un sentiment de confiance dans les décideurs peut être soutenu par des gestionnaires qui sont présents et réactifs, transparents dans leur communication, et qui impliquent le personnel des services d'urgence dans le développement des politiques et procédures cliniques. De telles pratiques aideront à protéger contre l'épuisement professionnel pour garantir le bien-être des travailleurs d'urgence.

Long COVID in children.

QUESTION: Several physicians in our family medicine clinic noted a recent increase in the number of children with nonspecific symptoms after having had COVID-19. Based on the assumption that these children may have long COVID syndrome, what is the recommended treatment? ANSWER: Lockdowns and isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic have affected the physical and mental health of children and adolescents. A recognized complication of COVID-19 is a post-COVID-19 syndrome (long COVID) that was initially reported in adults with an estimated prevalence of 10%. More recent reports on long COVID in children suggest a prevalence of 8% to 10%, but small cohorts, a range of symptoms, and challenges in defining the syndrome make accurately estimating the prevalence difficult. Furthermore, providers may find it challenging to differentiate between neuropsychiatric symptoms that are consequences of COVID-19 infection versus those that are a result of stress, anxiety, or changes in behaviour owing to restrictions associated with the pandemic. Until more evidence is available, management includes obtaining a detailed history, performing a comprehensive physical examination, and aiming to relieve symptoms while following up every 2 to 4 months.

Parental gender differences in attitudes and willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19.

AIMS: COVID-19 affects family life world-wide. Determinants of hesitancy around vaccinating children against COVID-19 are critical in guiding public health campaigns. Gender differences among parents may determine willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the COVID-19 Parental Attitude Study (COVIPAS) surveying care givers of children presenting for emergency care in 17 sites in 6 countries during peak pandemic (March-June, 2020). We assessed risk perceptions, vaccination history and plans to vaccinate children against COVID-19 once available. We compared responses given by father or mother and used multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2025 (75.4%) surveys were completed by mothers and 662 (24.6%) by fathers, 60 did not respond to question about future vaccination. Of 2627, 1721 (65.5%) were willing to vaccinate their children. In the multivariable analysis, both fathers and mothers were more willing to vaccinate their child if the parent was older and believed that social distancing is worthwhile, and if their child was up-to-date on childhood vaccines (odds ratio (OR) of 1.02, 3.90, 1.65 for mothers and 1.04, 4.76, 2.87 for fathers, respectively). Mothers (but not fathers) were more willing if they had more than a high school education (OR 1.38), and fathers (but not mothers) were more willing to vaccinate their male children (OR 1.62), compared to female children. CONCLUSION: Unique differences between mothers and fathers underscore the need to view vaccine hesitancy as an acceptable parental response. Public health should plan targeted educational information for parents about a COVID-19 vaccine for children.

Myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines.

QUESTION: With the approval of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine for children 5 to 11 years of age and concerns among parents in the past year following reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in adolescents, should my office continue to encourage all children and young adults to receive the COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccine? ANSWER: Since April 2021 reports have documented cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in adolescents and young adults after messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccination, and several hundred such reports were documented in Canada. Clinical presentations were mostly mild, with rare instances of admission to the hospital, and were typically among male adolescents 16 years of age and older within several days after the second dose of the vaccine. After vaccination, children and adolescents with symptoms of chest pain, shortness of breath, or palpitations should be evaluated with a physical examination, an electrocardiogram, and measurement of cardiac troponin levels. If results are abnormal, an echocardiogram or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be considered. Myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination are much less common, and much milder, than cardiac complications of COVID-19 infection, and vaccines should continue to be recommended to all those eligible.

Willingness to Accept Expedited COVID-19 Vaccine Research for Children Aged <12 Years After Adult Vaccine Approval.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess if caregivers' attitudes toward the regulatory process of approving the vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for children aged <12 years changed after a vaccine was approved for adults. METHODS: This was a larger scale COVIPAS (COVID-19 Parental Attitude Study) survey of caregivers presenting with their children aged ≤12 years for emergency care in 12 hospitals in the United States, Canada, and Israel. The study compared willingness to support abridged research into COVID-19 vaccines for children between the peak of the pandemic (March-May 2020) and after a COVID-19 vaccine became available for adults (December 2020-March 2021). FINDINGS: A total of 1956 surveys were included in the analyses. Overall, 385 (30.9%) caregivers in the pre-vaccine approval period and 250 (35.3%) caregivers in the post-adult vaccine phase supported abridged research into COVID-19 vaccines (P < 0.001). In both phases, mothers were less likely to favor abridged approval. Those with children who were fully vaccinated based on the pediatric schedule in their country favored abridged approval in phase 1 (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.08) but less so in phase 2. In both phases, age and concerns of parents that they had COVID-19 or their child had COVID-19 were not associated with changes in response between phases. IMPLICATIONS: Willingness to expedite vaccine approval increased after the emergency approval of COVID-19 vaccine for adults. Mothers are much less likely to approve expedited approval. No significant changes have been found in the composition of caregivers willing to forego regulatory demands on vaccine approval.

National COVID-19 vaccine program progress and parents' willingness to vaccinate their children.

Vaccinating children against COVID-19 is critical as a public health strategy in order to reach herd immunity and prevent illness among children and adults. The aim of the study was to identify correlation between willingness to vaccinate children under 12 years old, and vaccination rate for adult population in Canada, the United States, and Israel. This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey study (COVID-19 Parental Attitude Study) of parents of children 12 years and younger presenting to 12 pediatric emergency departments (EDs). Parental reports of willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 when vaccines for children will be approved was correlated to country-specific rate of vaccination during December 2020-March 2021, obtained from ourworldindata.org. Logistic regression models were fit with covariates for week and the corresponding vaccine rate. A total of 720 surveys were analyzed. In Canada, administering mostly first dose to the adult population, willingness to vaccinate children was trending downward (correlation = -0.28), in the United States, it was trending upwards (correlation = 0.21) and in Israel, initially significant increase with decline shortly thereafter (correlation = 0.06). Odds of willingness to vaccinate in Canada, the United States, and Israel was OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.63-1.07, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.99-1.56, and OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.95-1.12, respectively. A robust population-based vaccination program as in Israel, and to a lesser degree the United States, led to increasing willingness by parents to vaccinate their children younger than 12 years against COVID-19. In Canada, slow rate of vaccination of the adult population was associated with lower willingness to vaccinate children.

Caregiver Willingness to Vaccinate Their Children against COVID-19 after Adult Vaccine Approval.

Vaccines against COVID-19 are likely to be approved for children under 12 years in the near future. Understanding vaccine hesitancy in parents is essential for reaching herd immunity. A cross-sectional survey of caregivers in 12 emergency departments (ED) was undertaken in the U.S., Canada, and Israel. We compared reported willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19 with an initial survey and post-adult COVID-19 vaccine approval. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed for all children and for those <12 years. A total of 1728 and 1041 surveys were completed in phases 1 and 2, respectively. Fewer caregivers planned to vaccinate against COVID-19 in phase 2 (64.5% and 59.7%, respectively; p = 0.002). The most significant positive predictor of willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 was if the child was vaccinated per recommended local schedules. Fewer caregivers plan to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, despite vaccine approval for adults, compared to what was reported at the peak of the pandemic. Older caregivers who fully vaccinated their children were more likely to adopt vaccinating children. This study can inform target strategy design to implement adherence to a vaccination campaign.

Caregiver-reported delay in presentation to pediatric emergency departments for fear of contracting COVID-19: a multi-national cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if caregivers of children presenting to pediatric emergency departments (EDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic are delaying presenting to care for fear of contracting COVID-19. METHODS: This was a pre-planned secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey study of caregivers accompanying their children aged 0-19 years to 16 pediatric EDs in 5 countries from May to June 2020. An anonymous online survey, completed by caregivers via RedCAP, included caregiver and child demographics, presenting complaints, if they delayed presentation and whether symptoms worsened during this interval, as well as caregiver concern about the child or caregiver having COVID-19 at the time of ED visit. RESULTS: Of 1543 caregivers completing the survey, 287 (18.6%) reported a delay in seeking ED care due to concerns of contracting COVID-19 in the hospital. Of those, 124 (43.2%) stated their child's symptoms worsened during the waiting interval. Caregiver relationship to child [mother] (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.27-2.76), presence of chronic illness in child (OR 1.78. 95% CI 1.14-2.79), younger age of caregiver (OR 0.965, 95% CI 0.943-0.986), and caregiver concerns about lost work during the pandemic (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12) were independently associated with a COVID-19-related delayed presentation in multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one in five caregivers reported delaying ED presentation for their ill or injured child specifically due to fear of contracting COVID-19 while in hospital, with mothers, younger caregivers, caregivers of children with chronic illness, and those concerned about lost work more likely to report delaying ED presentation.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Déterminer si les aidants des enfants qui se présentent aux services d'urgence pédiatriques (SU) pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 retardent leur présentation pour prendre soin d'eux par crainte de contracter la COVID-19. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une analyze secondaire planifiée à l'avance d'une étude d'enquête transversale auprès des soignants accompagnant leurs enfants âgés de 0 à 19 ans dans 16 urgences pédiatriques de 5 pays entre mai et juin 2020. Une enquête anonyme en ligne, remplie par les soignants via RedCAP, comprenait les données démographiques du soignant et de l'enfant, les plaintes présentées, s'ils ont retardé la présentation et si les symptômes se sont aggravés pendant cet intervalle, ainsi que l'inquiétude du soignant quant à la présence de COVID-19 chez l'enfant ou le soignant au moment de la visite aux urgences. RéSULTATS: Sur les 1 543 soignants ayant répondu à l'enquête, 287 (18.6 %) ont déclaré avoir retardé le recours aux urgences par crainte de contracter le COVID-19 à l'hôpital. Parmi eux, 124 (43.2%) ont déclaré que les symptômes de leur enfant s'étaient aggravés pendant l'intervalle d'attente. Dans l'analyse de régression multivariable, le lien entre la personne qui s'occupe de l'enfant et la mère (OR 1.85, IC95 % 1.27­2.76), la présence d'une maladie chronique chez l'enfant (OR 1.78, IC95 % 1.14-2.79), le jeune âge de la personne qui s'occupe de l'enfant (OR 0.965, IC95 % 0.943-0.986) et les préoccupations de la personne qui s'occupe de l'enfant concernant la perte de travail pendant la pandémie (OR 1.08, IC95 % 1.04­1.12) ont été associés de manière indépendante à une présentation tardive. CONCLUSIONS: Près d'un soignant sur cinq a déclaré avoir retardé la présentation aux urgences de son enfant malade ou blessé par crainte de contracter le COVID-19 pendant son séjour à l'hôpital, avec les mères, les jeunes aidants, les soignants d'enfants souffrant de maladies chroniques et les personnes préoccupées par la perte de travail sont plus susceptibles de retarder la présentation aux urgences.

Post-COVID-19 multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.

QUESTION: The effect of acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on morbidity and mortality in children has been relatively small. If a child presents to my office with persistent fever and systemic hyperinflammation but no known exposure to COVID-19, how likely are they to have multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C)? What is currently known about MIS-C and what is the prognosis for children affected by it? ANSWER: Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the emergence of a novel condition presents yet another challenge to clinicians, public health professionals, and the pediatric population. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children is a rare but potentially severe condition seen in children with evidence of COVID-19 approximately 2 to 6 weeks before symptom onset. Common signs and symptoms include persistent fever, systemic hyperinflammation, gastrointestinal symptoms (eg, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea), mucocutaneous changes (eg, rash, conjunctivitis), headache, or cardiac dysfunction. As many children present as asymptomatic or with mild symptoms of COVID-19, the development of MIS-C can seem sudden and surprising to families and providers. Although children with MIS-C usually require hospitalization, the outcomes are largely favourable with prompt recognition and intense therapy.

Le syndrome inflammatoire multisystémique post-COVID-19 chez les enfants.

QUESTION: Les répercussions de la maladie au coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) sur la morbidité et la mortalité chez les enfants se sont révélées relativement faibles. Si un enfant se présente à ma clinique avec une fièvre persistante et une hyperinflammation systémique sans aucune exposition connue à la COVID-19, quelle est la probabilité qu'il soit atteint du syndrome inflammatoire multisystémique de l'enfant (MIS-C)? Que sait-on actuellement du MIS-C et quel est le pronostic pour les enfants qui en souffrent? RÉPONSE: En plein cœur de la pandémie de la COVID-19, l'émergence d'un nouveau problème présente encore une fois un défi additionnel aux cliniciens, aux professionnels de la santé publique et à la population pédiatrique. Le syndrome inflammatoire multisystémique chez les enfants est rare, mais potentiellement grave, et il a été observé chez des enfants dont la maladie à la COVID-19 a été confirmée environ 2 à 6 semaines avant l'apparition des symptômes. Au nombre des signes et des symptômes courants figurent une fièvre persistante, une hyperinflammation systémique, des malaises gastro-intestinaux (p. ex. douleurs abdominales, vomissements, diarrhée), des changements mucocutanés (p. ex. éruptions cutanées, conjonctivite), une céphalée ou une dysfonction cardiaque. Étant donné que de nombreux enfants sont asymptomatiques ou ne présentent que des symptômes légers de la COVID-19, le développement du MIS-C peut sembler soudain et surprenant aux familles et aux médecins. Même si les enfants atteints du MIS-C nécessitent habituellement une hospitalisation, les issues sont largement favorables grâce à une reconnaissance rapide du syndrome et à une thérapie intense.

A tale of two parts of Switzerland: regional differences in the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on parents.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to document the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on regions within a European country. METHODS: Parents arriving at two pediatric emergency departments (EDs) in North of Switzerland and two in South of Switzerland completed an online survey during the first peak of the pandemic (April-June 2020). They were asked to rate their concern about their children or themselves having COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 662 respondents completed the survey. Parents in the South were significantly more exposed to someone tested positive for COVID-19 than in the North (13.9 and 4.7%, respectively; P <  0.001). Parents in the South were much more concerned than in the North that they (mean 4.61 and 3.32, respectively; P <  0.001) or their child (mean 4.79 and 3.17, respectively; P <  0.001) had COVID-19. Parents reported their children wore facemasks significantly more often in the South than in the North (71.5 and 23.5%, respectively; P <  0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant regional differences among families arriving at EDs in Switzerland. Public health agencies should consider regional strategies, rather than country-wide guidelines, in future pandemics and for vaccination against COVID-19 for children.